Monday, October 29, 2018

Flexible Mortgage Contracts

The most regrettable feature of the 2008 recession was the contagion of  foreclosures that swept through vulnerable neighborhoods, impoverishing a whole generation of beginning homeowners, many of them descendants of oppressed ancestors.  I anticipated this well in advance, having witnessed risky lending practises during the previous decade, responsive to many years of uninterrupted home-price inflation and the promise of economic stabilization by the Fed.  This dynamic affected blacks disproportionally, owing to 1990s legislation forcing home lending in redlined neighborhoods.
During the years leading to the 2008 recession, mortgage brokers maximized their commissions by encouraging buyers to take loans for the full appraised value and more.  Thus, buyers were almost ‘under water’ on day one, or following the slightest unfavorable event.  Second mortgages up to 115% of value were encouraged, tempting borrowers to treat them income streams – all on the assumption that the upward home-price trajectory would continue.  Brokers pushed adjustable-rate mortgages on the most vulnerable, least sophisticated buyers.
During the recession, home deflation became epidemic.  That is, one defaulted/abandoned home in a neighborhood caused devaluation of neighboring homes, which were consequently abandoned hence intensifying and spreading failure like a forest fire.
Interested parties just watched as this epidemic destroyed wealth of aspiring homeowners.  A broker has no interest in a completed loan once it's sold off to a bank or investor group.  Our government bailed the institutions out.  There was a government home-refinancing program that helped stronger homeowners, provided they held on through the recession.
Back in 2006 and 2007, I contemplated a flexible mortgage contract, one where the lenders and buyers would share the burden of changing externalities, so the buyer could weather a recession without losing his/her home.  Accordingly, interest and principle would be adjusted temporarily to relieve homeowners of most of the shock but eventually altered to make lenders whole after a recession subsides.  Preventing the abandonment epidemic would mollify, possibly prevent a recession.
Flexible loan contracts should have been implemented in response to the 2008 recession but weren’t.  Instead, the Dodd-Frank legislation required banks to hold more capital.  There was no legislation to protect borrowers early in a downturn.  Lawmakers, lawyers, politicians, economists and bankers, are binary thinkers, ill prepared to design loans for an economic downturn.  That work might need some engineers, the kind who guided Voyager and New Horizons near our most distant planets.

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Liberal vs Conservative Legacy

In a letter to the Tennessean Oct 24, Donald and Nan Chunn say that the Democratic Party embraces godless Marxism and that electing democrats offends our veterans who sacrificed fighting communism.  This is not supported by facts.
Both of our wars to contain communism (Korea, Vietnam) were started by Democratic presidents and stopped by Republican presidents without wins.
Communism doesn’t evolve from socialism.  It springs from autocracy when too many people are suffering, hopeless and confused.  Socialism alleviates suffering and hopelessness, thereby averting communist revolution.
All political and economic systems are godless, regardless of sanctimonious claims.
Efforts by liberals to alleviate suffering and injustice have left us with valuable legacies, eg social security, civil rights, universal suffrage, medicare, medicaid, child-labor laws, 40-hour work week, affordable health care, environmental preservation, recovered economy twice.  The main conservative legacy (Reagan, Bush 2, Trump) is ballooning National Debt.  Our descendants will benefit from the liberal legacy but will be burdened by the conservative legacy.

Published in The Tennessean, Nov 1, 2018

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Foot-pad cracked-skin scraper

For several years I have suffered from thickened, cracking, inflamed skin at the edges of my footpads.  The cracking is due to non-compliance of the thickend layer, which is shed skin lingering due to an adhesive that is weakened by hot-water soaking.  Pumice-stone rubbing after footsoak or shower didn’t suffice.  Similarly, Dr Scholl's foot file wasn't aggressive enough.
Sometimes my fingernails after a shower-bath were surprisingly effective, so I imagined a device that would act like a crowded bunch of fingernails.  The device described and pictured below worked better than expected, separating dead, adherant skin quickly and thoroughly without harming the live skin beneath.
  Here’s how it’s made:  Buy a multi-diameter hole-saw attachment for a power-drill.  Remove the shaft.  Leave the blades all in their slots, secured by glue if necessary.  Using the flat side of a grinding wheel, grind down the saw teeth uniformly almost but not quite completely.
After a bath/shower, rub the thick dead skin gently back and forth with the abrasive face of the scraper.  The dead skin will roll up and/or flake off exposing the good skin satisfyingly.  Don’t try to do it all in one sitting.  Repeat the process after subsequent baths/showers until the offending dead-skin accumulation is finally gone – and soft, noncracking, living skin prevails.